Dear colleagues, For a review paper on SRM scenario framing, we would like to study how experts think about commonly used baselines to which to compare SRM simulations.
Two frequently used baselines are as follows: A) “Same Global Mean Surface Temperature” framing Comparing a “moderate / high greenhouse gas with SRM” scenario to a scenario with lower greenhouse gas concentrations and no SRM, but the same GMST B) “Same Greenhouse Gas” framing: Comparing a “moderate / high greenhouse gas with SRM” scenario to a scenario with the same greenhouse gas concentrations and no SRM, hence higher GMST We would like to hear from SRM researchers which of these two baselines - or others - you perceive as being dominant, and most useful. If you would like to contribute, please fill in our short survey below. It should only take a few minutes. https://forms.office.com/e/xMRgJ7jz9k Best regards Claudia Wieners (Utrecht University, https://www.uu.nl/medewerkers/CEWieners ) Colleen Golja (Imperial Colledge, London) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAJUUK5dK6yvYBqnByPP7y%2BXF%2Bgtmg%3DwDttY3jadinyd6n%3D0tug%40mail.gmail.com.
