SOLAR GEOENGINEERING WEEKLY SUMMARY (01 JULY - 07 JULY 2024)
<https://substack.com/app-link/publications/1346479/drafts/8cb72c1e-e66f-4dfa-8441-d10939d0b896?publication_id=1346479&post_id=146410519&utm_source=post-email-title&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=false>

Subscribe to our newsletter to receive monthly updates on Solar
Geoengineering:
Solar Geoengineering Updates
<https://solargeoengineeringupdates.substack.com?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=publication_embed&utm_medium=email>
Monthly news summaries about solar geoengineering. Links to scientific
papers, news articles, jobs, podcasts, and videos.
<https://solargeoengineeringupdates.substack.com?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=publication_embed&utm_medium=email>
By Andrew Lockley
<https://solargeoengineeringupdates.substack.com?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=publication_embed&utm_medium=email>
------------------------------
RESEARCH PAPERSDrone-Based Measurement of the Size Distribution and
Concentration of Marine Aerosols above the Great Barrier Reef
<https://www.mdpi.com/2504-446X/8/7/292>

Eckert, C., Hernandez-Jaramillo, D. C., Medcraft, C., Harrison, D. P., &
Kelaher, B. P. (2024). Drone-Based Measurement of the Size Distribution and
Concentration of Marine Aerosols above the Great Barrier Reef.
*Drones*, *8*(7),
292.

*Abstract*

Marine aerosol particles can act as cloud condensation nuclei and influence
the atmospheric boundary layer by scattering solar radiation. The
interaction of ocean waves and coral reefs may affect the distribution and
size of marine aerosol particles. Measuring this effect has proven
challenging. Here, we tested the hypothesis that the distribution and size
of marine aerosol particles would vary over three distinct zones (i.e.,
coral lagoon, surf break, and open water) near One Tree Island in the Great
Barrier Reef, which is approximately 85 km off the east coast of Australia.
We used a modified DJI Agras T30 drone fitted with a miniaturised scanning
electrical mobility sizer and advanced mixing condensation particle counter
to collect data on aerosol size distribution between 30 and 300 nm at 20 m
above the water surface. We conducted 30 flights over ten days during the
Austral summer/autumn of 2023. The fitted bimodal lognormal curves indicate
that the number concentrations for aerosols below 85 nm diameter are more
than 16% higher over the lagoon than over open water. The average mean mode
diameters remained constant across the different zones, indicating no
significant influence of breaking waves on the detected aerosol size modes.
The most influential explanatory variable for aerosol size distribution was
the difference between air temperature and the underlying sea surface,
explaining around 40% of the variability. Salinity also exhibited a
significant influence, explaining around 12% of the measured variability in
the number concentration of aerosols throughout the campaign. A calculated
wind stress magnitude did not reveal significant variation in the measured
marine aerosol concentrations. Overall, our drone-based aerosol
measurements near the water surface effectively characterise the dynamics
of background marine aerosols around One Tree Island Reef, illustrating the
value of drone-based systems for providing size-dependent aerosol
information in difficult-to-access and environmentally sensitive areas.

Measurement report: Aerosol vertical profiling over the Southern Great
Barrier Reef using lidar and MAX-DOAS measurements
<https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-1111/>

Ryan, R. G., Toms-Hardman, L., Smirnov, A., Harrison, D., & Schofield, R.
(2024). Measurement report: Aerosol vertical profiling over the Southern
Great Barrier Reef using lidar and MAX-DOAS measurements. *EGUsphere*,
*2024*, 1-20.

*Abstract*

Aerosol vertical profile measurements were made using multi-axis
differential optical absorption spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) and mini-Micropulse
LiDAR (MPL) at One Tree Island in the Southern Great Barrier Reef from
February to April 2023. This is an understudied location in terms of
atmospheric aerosols and chemistry but is growing in importance as multiple
research streams examine the influence of aerosols on radiation over the
Great Barrier Reef. Solar radiation management proposals require
regional-scale aerosol modelling, which is evaluated against aerosol
extinction and optical depth measurements, necessitating a thorough
understanding of measurements of these quantities. MPL aerosol retrieval
showed extinction-to-backscatter ratios (0.031 on average) and
depolarization ratios (0.015 on average) consistent with clean, unpolluted
Southern hemispheric marine aerosol. The maximum depolarization ratio
tended to be above the layer of maximum MPL backscatter, which is
attributed to dried sea-salt layers above the boundary layer. MAX-DOAS and
MPL extinction profiles show aerosol layers extending beyond 2 km altitude
in the middle of the day, but predominantly below 1 km at other times. We
also compared aerosol optical depth measurements from integrating the
MAX-DOAS and MPL extinction profiles, with observations from a hand-held
Microtops sun photometer. Mean aerosol optical depth (AOD) values across
the campaign compare well, being 0.083 ± 0.002 for the Microtops, 0.090 ±
0.032 for the MAX-DOAS and 0.104 ± 0.028 for the MPL. However, AOD
observations at a given time, and the AOD diurnal cycle, often varied
between instruments. This likely indicates strong horizontal inhomogeneity
in aerosol in this environment, a factor which makes it challenging to
accurately compare AOD estimates from different viewing geometries, but
which is important for future aerosol modelling studies in this region to
consider.

Uncertainties and confidence in stratospheric aerosol injection modelling:
a systematic literature review
<https://academic.oup.com/oocc/advance-article/doi/10.1093/oxfclm/kgae007/7699797>

Määttänen, A., Lameille, T., Kloeck, C., Boucher, O., & Ravetta, F. (2024).
Uncertainties and confidence in stratospheric aerosol injection modelling:
a systematic literature review. *Oxford Open Climate Change*, kgae007.

*Abstract*

Model projections performed to evaluate the efficacy and impacts of solar
geoengineering interventions, such as Stratospheric Aerosol Injection
(SAI), include multiple sources of uncertainty, namely scenario, model, and
natural variability uncertainty. It is well accepted that a quantitative
uncertainty assessment related to SAI modelling is required to provide
robust and policy-relevant information on SAI. This study investigates how
and to what extent articles using a climate modelling approach on SAI
quantify and communicate uncertainty sources. We conducted a systematic
literature review of a sample of 60 peer-reviewed articles in order to (a)
analyse whether uncertainties were addressed, and if yes, which methods
were used to characterize uncertainties, and (b) study how the articles
communicated assumptions and limits that contribute to the estimation of
confidence in the used models and the resulting projections. We present
statistics on the uncertainty quantification methods used in the articles
and we discuss the vocabulary employed for conveying these uncertainties
and model confidence. In the studied article sample, the attention paid to
uncertainty estimations in the SAI literature increased with time, and
overall, uncertainties were treated using a variety of methods. Model
confidence was not always explicitly communicated as the models used are
already tested in the literature and their strengths and weaknesses are
known to the community although this is often implicit. Our results show
that it is currently difficult to perform global, quantitative assessments
of uncertainty related to SAI research, in line with recent review reports
on solar geoengineering.

How scientific and partisan media shape support for research on
stratospheric aerosol injection
<https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09644016.2024.2375900>

Bolsen, T., Palm, R., & Kingsland, J. T. (2024). How scientific and
partisan media shape support for research on stratospheric aerosol
injection. *Environmental Politics*, 1-22.

*Abstract*

Stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) is a controversial technique that has
been suggested as a means of temporarily halting global warming. A study
conducted on 441 individuals in the US in November 2023 investigated the
impact of three video presentations either promoting or opposing research
on SAI. Two of the videos were presented by scientific experts either
promoting or opposing further research into this technology. The third was
politicized, featuring Tucker Carlson on Fox News, and arguing that SAI
would endanger Americans. We found that all three of the video
presentations had a strong influence on general support for or against
research, and that the politicized presentation not only reduced support
for research but also reduced trust in science and technology to provide
solutions to problems facing humanity. The findings suggest the strong
impact of messaging on public opinion about research into SAI as a climate
change intervention strategy.

Stratospheric aerosol injection for controlling greenhouse gas emission
<https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780443192319000120>

Irfan, M., Musarat, M. A., Ayub, S., & Alaloul, W. S. (2024). Stratospheric
aerosol injection for controlling greenhouse gas emission. In *Advances and
Technology Development in Greenhouse Gases: Emission, Capture and
Conversion* (pp. 455-473). Elsevier.

*Abstract*

An artificial method of injecting sulfate aerosols into the stratosphere to
reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) is called stratospheric aerosol
injection (SAI). By releasing sulfates into the atmosphere, volcanic
eruptions naturally disperse sunlight and lower the temperature of the
Earth’s surface. This technique attempts to replicate that process. SAI has
drawn interest as a possible geoengineering technique to mitigate the
effects of climate change. It does, however, present important ethical,
technical, and environmental issues that need to be properly resolved
before deployment is ever discussed. Regional climate alteration, ozone
layer depletion, disruption of precipitation patterns, and negative health
consequences on humans are among the possible dangers linked to solar
radiation exposure. Concerns about consent, equity, governance frameworks,
and unexpected repercussions are all included in the category of ethical
considerations. Moreover, there are unknowns about the best injection
heights and aerosol volume needed for efficient cooling while reducing
additional hazards. To make informed judgments in the future regarding the
sustainability and practicality of using SAI as a tool to reduce greenhouse
gas emissions, it is imperative to have a thorough grasp of these intricate
concerns. Therefore, the current chapter will analyze the concept of SAI
and its anticipated benefits and challenges.

------------------------------
WEB POSTSThe Solar Geoengineering Updates Newsletter (June'2024)
<https://substack.com/app-link/post?publication_id=1945767&post_id=146257468&utm_source=post-email-title&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=22k0yw&token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjoxMjUyMjU5NjAsInBvc3RfaWQiOjE0NjI1NzQ2OCwiaWF0IjoxNzIwMDQ1MzI2LCJleHAiOjE3MjI2MzczMjYsImlzcyI6InB1Yi0xOTQ1NzY3Iiwic3ViIjoicG9zdC1yZWFjdGlvbiJ9.vkjD36DLZ06WVQ783kmXr5xH0eZ_JtgwchBP9ym3MiM>
Solar Geoengineering Updates
The Solar Geoengineering Updates Newsletter (June'2024)
<https://solargeoengineeringupdates.substack.com/p/the-solar-geoengineering-updates-185?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=email>


Read more
<https://solargeoengineeringupdates.substack.com/p/the-solar-geoengineering-updates-185?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=email>
5 days ago · 1 like · Andrew Lockley
Is cloud brightening a sensible way to combat climate change?
<https://illuminem.com/illuminemvoices/is-cloud-brightening-a-sensible-way-to-combat-climate-change>
(Illuminem)No, UK weather is not being manipulated
<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckmmkdr0m2po> (BBC)Africa cannot afford
to be complacent about solar radiation management
<https://www.climatechangenews.com/2024/07/04/africa-cannot-afford-to-be-complacent-about-solar-radiation-management/>
(Climate Home News)
------------------------------
PODCASTSExtra-tropical cyclones - Reboita | Reviewer 2 does geoengineering

Extra-tropical cyclones - Reboita

Reviewer 2 does geoengineering

44:20
<https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/extra-tropical-cyclones-reboita/id1529459393?i=1000661152262&uo=4>

"How does SAI affect extra-tropical cyclones? Michelle Simões Reboita
explains during a tight interview slot, but @geoengineering1 fails to
understand (it takes him at least an hour to understand ANYTHING). Paper:
Response of the Southern Hemisphere extratropical cyclone climatology to
climate intervention with stratospheric aerosol injection.
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2752-5295/ad519e/meta";

Gwynne Dyer on Intervention Earth: climate mitigation, CDR & SRM |
Challenging Climate  <https://www.challengingclimate.org/1873533/15345157>

"Our guest is Gwynne Dyer, an author, columnist, broadcaster and lecturer
on international affairs. In this episode, we discuss the key messages from
his new book Intervention Earth: Life-Saving Ideas from the World’s Climate
Engineers, based on extensive interviews with the world’s top climate
scientists. We discuss his insights from these interviews on the state of
our climate, and address controversies and concerns over carbon dioxide
removal (CDR) and solar radiation management (SRM)."

------------------------------
YOUTUBE VIDEOSCloud-brightening experiment halted on San Francisco Bay |
KPIX | CBS NEWS BAY AREA <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WG78T-A7yi0>

“Climate experiments, such as using sea salt particles to test potential
cloud brightening, will continue to be funded. Anne Makovec and Molly
McCrea report.”

Sci-Fi or Reality? Talking Tomorrow’s Climate Tech | The Aspen Institute
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIljhanTwvE>

“It sounds like sci-fi: Scientists are beaming solar energy from space,
subbing seaweed for plastic and brightening clouds to reflect sunlight to
lower temperatures in a warming world. In this series of short talks,
innovators working at the cutting edge of climate tech share recent
breakthroughs in the field.”

------------------------------
*UPCOMING EVENTS**Fourteenth GeoMIP Workshop
<https://climate.envsci.rutgers.edu/GeoMIP/2024.html> | 10-12 July 2024 |
Ithaca, USA*(NEW) Planetary Sunshade Foundation DC Social Event
<https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeF0r-lggmDN6g2zc-U3MQIarXAIHkM35s7De6wVBKcc4dBmw/viewform>
| 18 July 2024 | Washington, DC, United States*RFF 2024 SRM Social Science
Workshop: Cooperative vs. Non-Cooperative Interventions
<https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1zE6Eo625cpEKZVbKwzDQSL4gxmnArmPsxtePJM-1SY0/viewform?edit_requested=true&gxid=-8203366>
| 19-20 September 2024 | Washington, DC.**(NEW) The 2025 Degrees Global
Forum <https://www.degrees.ngo/globalforum/> | 12-16 May 2025 | Cape Town,
South Africa**(NEW) Artic Repair Conference 2025 by University of Cambridge
& Center for Climate Repair
<https://www.climaterepair.cam.ac.uk/events/artic-repair-conference-2025> |
26-28 June 2025 | Cambridge UK*

Solar Geoengineering Events Calendar <https://teamup.com/ks64mmvtit583eitxx>

*GUIDELINES:**Sync selected events to your default calendar in these simple
steps:**1) Click on the event you want to sync.**2) Tap the menu icon
(three vertical lines) at the top left.**3) Choose 'Share.'**4) Pick your
default calendar.**5) Save the event.*

*Sync the entire Teamup Calendar to your default calendar with these simple
steps:**1) Tap the menu icon (three vertical lines) at the top right.**2)
Choose 'Preferences.'**3) Click 'iCalendar Feeds.'**4) Copy the URL shown
for 'Solar Geoengineering Events / SRM Deadlines.'’**5) Paste the URL into
your default calendar settings (Open Google Calendar in your web browser if
you are using Gcal).**6) Click 'Subscribe' or 'Add Calendar.'*

*For more detailed instructions,
visit: https://calendar.teamup.com/kb/subscribe-to-teamup-icalendar-feeds/
<https://calendar.teamup.com/kb/subscribe-to-teamup-icalendar-feeds/>*

*You can directly sync all Solar Geoengineering events to your default
calendars by pressing the link below:*

Sync SG Events to your Default Calendar
<https://ics.teamup.com/feed/ks64mmvtit583eitxx/0.ics>
<https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F1cb51c13-9888-4422-a864-b78279a369f9_720x998.png>
Solar
Geoengineering Events Calendar <https://teamup.com/ks64mmvtit583eitxx>
------------------------------
*DEADLINES**Call for Abstracts—AGU Conference | Submissions are open until
31 July 2024 <https://www.agu.org/annual-meeting>*

*SRM Sessions at AGU2024:**GC009-Advances in Climate Engineering Science
<https://agu.confex.com/agu/agu24/prelim.cgi/Session/227097>**A081-Exploring
the Interplay of Weather Modification and Climate Intervention: Modeling,
Observations, and Field Campaigns
<https://agu.confex.com/agu/agu24/prelim.cgi/Session/230051>**GC004-Advancements
in Climate Intervention Research Technologies, Policies and Practices:
Opportunities and Issues
<https://agu.confex.com/agu/agu24/prelim.cgi/Session/226893>**GC048-Climate
Intervention, Mitigation, Adaptation, and Restoration: Assessing the Risks
and Benefits of Using Earth System Models for Guidance on Climate Action
<https://agu.confex.com/agu/agu24/prelim.cgi/Session/227971>*

*Call for Abstract—Cloud and precipitation responses to aerosol pollution,
weather modification and climate intervention
<https://annual.ametsoc.org/index.cfm/2025/> | Deadline to apply: 15 August
2024**Funding opportunity: Modelling environmental responses to solar
radiation management by Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) |
Deadline to apply: 08 October 202
<https://www.ukri.org/opportunity/modelling-environmental-responses-to-solar-radiation-management/>4*

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAHJsh9_zOtCvEtgYHSdGgis0Tx%2Bhtwky1p%3DGOYjr%2B_4K0TeJXg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to