The original 2023 PDF booklet of 54p is  *Marine de Guglielmo Weber, et
autres. (2023, Novembre). Géo-ingénierie solaire: enjeux géostratégiques et
de défense. l’Observatoire Défense & Climat.*
https://defenseclimat.fr/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Note_5_Obs-DC_Geo-ingenierie_VF.pdf

Le mar. 10 sept. 2024 à 14:25, Geoengineering News <
[email protected]> a écrit :

>
> https://www.politics-dz.com/opportunities-and-risks-solar-geoengineering-scenarios-for-climate-change-mitigation-by-2050/
>
> *07 September 2024*
>
> With warnings of rising planetary temperatures and the international
> community’s failure to implement preventative policies to combat climate
> change, the importance of developing technological solutions like solar
> geoengineering has increased. Solar geoengineering aims to reduce global
> temperatures by modifying solar radiation (SRM) or by decreasing
> atmospheric carbon dioxide through capture and storage in oceans or on land
> (CDR). In the absence of a genuine commitment to reducing emissions,
> scientists propose solar geoengineering as a last-ditch effort to tackle
> global warming.
>
> In this context, a recent report by the French Defense and Climate
> Observatory highlighted the developments in the widespread deployment of
> solar geoengineering technologies in the coming decades, the associated
> natural and human risks, key actors, and the role of major powers in this
> field. The report also presented potential scenarios and recommendations
> for deploying these technologies by 2050.
> *Nature of Technologies and Risks:*
>
> Solar geoengineering, or solar radiation management (SRM), involves
> techniques designed to reflect sunlight to cool the Earth through
> large-scale, deliberate intervention in the Earth’s climate system to
> mitigate the harmful effects of global warming. However, using these
> techniques involves both human and natural risks. Several types of SRM
> technologies are designed, including:
>
> *Local Solar Geoengineering:* Two local techniques have been developed:
> marine cloud brightening (MCB) and cloud thinning (CCT). Marine cloud
> brightening involves injecting tiny droplets into marine clouds to make
> them brighter and more reflective by spraying sea salt into low marine
> clouds. Brighter clouds help reduce the amount of solar radiation reaching
> the Earth’s surface, thereby lowering atmospheric and ocean temperatures.
>
> *Planetary Solar Geoengineering:* This involves injecting aerosols into
> the stratosphere (SAI) on a planetary scale. This method disperses
> reflective particles via aircraft or balloons in the stratosphere,
> targeting the release of sulfate particles to reduce the amount of sunlight
> reaching the Earth and the heat trapped in the atmosphere. This approach
> aims to create cooling conditions similar to those following major volcanic
> eruptions. While this technique is the most studied for modifying radiative
> balance, it is also the most controversial due to its planetary scope and
> associated scientific uncertainties.
>
> *Space-Based Solar Geoengineering:* Some solar geoengineering projects
> plan to deploy reflective devices (mirrors) in outer space to reflect about
> 2% of sunlight. This technique is less advanced and less studied due to its
> complexity and high costs, estimated in billions of dollars. Mirrors would
> need to be launched by rocket and positioned about 1,500,000 kilometers
> from Earth at the “Lagrange L1” point, where Earth’s gravity
> counterbalances the Sun’s gravity, allowing objects to be stable in orbit.
>
> According to a 2023 United Nations report on solar geoengineering, the
> mirrors would last about 20 years. Currently, there is only one space-based
> geoengineering project, titled “Space Bubbles,” being carried out by a team
> from MIT, aimed at dispersing some sunlight away from Earth. However, it
> remains theoretical.
>
> There are several natural risks associated with the three solar
> geoengineering techniques, including: persistent effects related to
> increased carbon dioxide levels, reduced photosynthesis affecting humidity,
> rainfall, and local oxygen concentrations (e.g., drought in South America,
> increased tropical rainfall), ozone layer degradation, increased
> hurricanes, and extreme climate changes with severe impacts on temperatures
> and ecosystems due to solar radiation.
>
> Human risks include: reduced agricultural yields, decreased primary
> productivity in the Amazon, slight increases in rainfall disruption in
> Africa, health risks associated with temperature changes, declining air
> quality, and loss of ecosystem services (e.g., decreased photosynthesis).
>
>
> Additionally, there is a common risk known as “social and technical
> lock-in,” where developed technologies become entrenched due to economic
> and political interests, making it difficult to reverse their deployment
> even if they prove ineffective or harmful, leading to what is known as
> “terminal shock.” This risk is particularly relevant for space mirrors,
> which might become targets in military conflicts, potentially causing an
> immediate increase in global temperatures. This risk also applies to
> geoengineering operations requiring ongoing chemical interventions.
> *Network of Actors:*
>
> The actors in the field of solar geoengineering vary between major
> countries, the scientific community, as well as the private sector,
> international bodies, and non-governmental organizations. However, major
> powers remain the most influential actors in the solar geoengineering
> network. Key players include:
>
> *United States:* The country is the most advanced in solar
> geoengineering, dominating the sector through several major projects (such
> as Harvard, the University of California, Cornell). The Department of
> Defense is significantly involved, and the private sector has increasingly
> financed research, granting around $20 million from 2008 to 2018 for solar
> geoengineering initiatives and projects.
>
> *China:* Active in solar geoengineering research, as evidenced by a
> publicly funded Chinese research project from 2015 to 2019. This project
> aims to study the climate impacts of solar geoengineering and explore
> related governance issues. In August 2020, China conducted a local solar
> geoengineering experiment on the Dagu Glacier in Sichuan to reduce glacier
> melting during summer.
>
> *Russia:* Does not have a research program in solar geoengineering based
> on available information. However, the former Soviet Union had laid the
> groundwork for aerosol injection into the stratosphere, a proposal by
> researcher Budyko in the late 1970s. Moscow’s official stance appears
> supportive of solar geoengineering, as evidenced by its request to include
> a section on it as a potential climate change solution in the 2013
> Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report and its acknowledgment of
> ongoing developments in geoengineering techniques.
> *Expected Scenarios:*
>
> Several scenarios are proposed for the future of solar geoengineering by
> 2050:
>
> *Scenario One: Unilateral Deployment by the United States:* This scenario
> assumes that by 2047, the global average temperature will rise by +2.5°C
> compared to pre-industrial levels, with greenhouse gas emissions not
> sufficiently reduced and the international community failing to meet Paris
> Agreement goals. All countries will experience widespread natural disasters
> annually, resulting in thousands of casualties and displaced people,
> weakening the economic situation globally. In the U.S., political tensions
> rise, and the country becomes the world’s second superpower after China,
> starting from 2039. Additionally, drought and water scarcity severely
> impact agriculture, making cotton and corn cultivation impossible, and
> soybean and wheat yields drop by about 40% starting in 2025.
>
> In this context, public criticism of the U.S. government increases for not
> adequately anticipating climate change impacts and delaying adaptation
> efforts. Consequently, in 2047, the U.S. officially announces the
> deployment of stratospheric aerosol injection, while it has not ratified
> the 2035 Solar Geoengineering Convention that prohibits unilateral
> technology deployment. This unilateral decision entrenches international
> polarization. With the UN and Security Council failing to resolve the
> crisis, Russia and China, along with a few partners, launch a diplomatic
> campaign condemning the “selfish” actions of the U.S., threatening military
> intervention, and initiating discussions within the alliance about
> counter-solar geoengineering operations.
>
> *Scenario Two: China and the “ArcticX” Project:* This scenario posits
> that by 2050, global warming will reach +2.6°C compared to pre-industrial
> times. This will lead to the collapse of the Greenland ice sheet, the
> complete disappearance of winter ice in the Barents Sea, and the melting of
> summer ice in the Arctic, causing a two-meter rise in average sea levels,
> submerging thousands of homes, and leaving entire communities without
> habitable land. Biodiversity will also face consecutive extinctions, with
> thousands of plant and animal species disappearing since 2020.
> Additionally, conflicts over water and food resources, as well as social
> and environmental conflicts, will intensify.
>
> In this context, an alliance of countries will form to deploy solar
> geoengineering technologies, with the U.S., China, and India leading,
> aiming to mitigate climate change impacts and calm rising social
> disturbances. After several proposals for deployment are rejected by the
> UN, China proposes a regional solar geoengineering initiative to protect
> the Arctic, announcing the “ArcticX” project in 2050, which aims to enhance
> the reflectivity of marine clouds over the Arctic.
>
> This regional deployment receives support from all allied countries and
> most regional nations (such as Canada, Norway, Denmark, and Iceland),
> interested in protecting the poles. However, it faces opposition from
> Moscow, as melting ice caps in Greenland and the Barents Sea would allow
> Russia to use the Arctic as a commercial shipping route, rich in oil,
> natural gas, and minerals, and crucial fish resources. Consequently, Russia
> threatens to militarily attack the ships deployed by China.
>
> *Scenario Three: Solar Geoengineering as a New Consumer Commodity:* In
> the first half of the 21st century, the Amazon rainforest gradually
> transforms into savanna, releasing increasing amounts of carbon dioxide
> into the atmosphere, surpassing an irreparable tipping point, resulting in
> a rise in the global average temperature to +3°C by 2037 compared to
> pre-industrial levels. Agricultural losses will affect 40% of global
> production. Consequently, technological advancements in carbon extraction
> from the atmosphere will face commercial and political failure due to
> ineffective technologies and social and environmental conflicts.
>
> In this context, several countries (including the U.S., the U.K., Gulf
> States, Russia, and Maghreb countries), supported by oil lobby groups, will
> move towards deploying solar geoengineering. Europe will be divided, with
> Sweden, Norway, and Spain opposing any solar geoengineering deployment and
> implementing an emergency mitigation plan, while countries like France,
> Germany, and Italy will emphasize the need for urgent cooling measures. In
> 2037, oil lobby groups, backed by the U.S. and Gulf States, will develop a
> strategy to promote solar geoengineering to individual consumers, creating
> a new commercial market by promoting a new form of individual climate
> commitment. Meanwhile, several G77 countries, led by China, will strongly
> oppose these moves.
>
> In conclusion, the French Ministry of Defense recommended integrating
> solar geoengineering as a political, geostrategic, and military tool,
> enhancing information exchange in this field, particularly through raising
> the issue in strategic bilateral dialogues, strengthening partnerships with
> atmospheric science research institutes (such as MétéoFrance), and
> integrating research on climate change impacts on natural systems and
> potential effects of solar geoengineering. The ministry also recommended
> establishing a scientific, technological, and geostrategic monitoring body
> to oversee the development of solar geoengineering projects and anticipate
> the ability of various actors to maintain technological leadership enabling
> unilateral large-scale deployment.
>
> *Source: Politics_DZ*
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "geoengineering" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAHJsh98o5Admqz7OkNpXEewRnFkDO%2BEb%2BadycnLwvwpHV4oBmw%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAHJsh98o5Admqz7OkNpXEewRnFkDO%2BEb%2BadycnLwvwpHV4oBmw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAHodn9-2A2OB-LTwJkJLGHzGnrUG2W1eXCmMJRkXP8zcsXqg1Q%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to