https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/12355/2024/
*Authors* Ou Wang, Ju Liang, Yuchen Gu, Jim M. Haywood, Ying Chen, Chenwei Fang, and Qin'geng Wang *08 November 2024* *Citations*: Wang, O., Liang, J., Gu, Y., Haywood, J. M., Chen, Y., Fang, C., and Wang, Q.: Projected future changes in extreme precipitation over China under stratospheric aerosol intervention in the UKESM1 climate model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 12355–12373, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12355-2024, 2024. *Abstract* Extreme precipitation events are linked to severe economic losses and casualties in China every year; hence, exploring the potential mitigation strategies to minimize these events and their changes in frequency and intensity under global warming is of importance, particularly for the populous subregions. In addition to global warming scenarios, this study examines the effects of the potential deployment of stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) on hydrological extremes in China based on the SAI simulations (G6sulfur) of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) by the UK Earth System Model (UKESM1) simulations. G6sulfur is compared with simulations of the future climate under two different emission scenarios (SSP5-8.5 and SSP2-4.5) and a reduction in the solar constant (G6solar) to understand the effect of SAI on extreme precipitation patterns. The results show that under global warming scenarios, precipitation and extreme wet climate events during 2071–2100 are projected to increase relative to the control period (1981–2010) across all the subregions in China. Extreme drought events show a projected increase in southern China. The G6sulfur and G6solar experiments show statistically similar results to those under SSP2-4.5 in extreme precipitation intensities of China in UKESM1. These results are encouraging. The efficacy of SAI in decreasing extreme precipitation events and consecutive wet days is more pronounced than that of G6solar when compared to SSP2-4.5. While both G6sulfur and G6solar show drying at high-latitude regions, which is consistent with our understanding of the spin-down of the hydrological cycle under SRM. Given the limitations of the current model and the small ensemble size, and considering that the hydrological effects are less beneficial than those indicated for temperature, it is recommended that further, more comprehensive research be performed, including using multiple models, to better understand these impacts. *Source: EGU* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAHJsh99Y6bBa1-dHguYcfrv3mktaGz3qKOPY0ygMb9ufxRbxEQ%40mail.gmail.com.
