Dear Charlotte and other colleagues, 

 

Physical simulations are needed but do almost nothing to address the anxiety 
around solar geoengineering on environmental, geopolitical, and ethical 
grounds. Physical variables seem to be the only authoritative ones in the 
debate. At the same time, the justification for advocating solar geoengineering 
is often based on the idea that it should be used to prevent more human 
suffering. However, little is empirical about human suffering in how the 
discussion is conducted.

 

Within that context, I would like to point out what Kyriacos Koupparis and 
Jesse Mason are doing at the UN World Food Programme on Anticipatory Action and 
Early Warning Systems. If I understand it properly (which is not granted), it 
seems it could offer a way to predict how climate interventions could affect 
not only agriculture but, most importantly, hunger. Perhaps the modeling that 
climate scientists are doing could be connected to those guys' modeling. 

 

I know that coupling the modeling of different systems is nothing new and it is 
very complicated. But looking at what Reflective is doing, in addition to 
showing what we already see in academic papers in a (bit) more user-friendly 
format, perhaps something more related to impacts other than the usual physical 
ones would be a real contribution. 

 

Best wishes,

Renzo Taddei  

 

 

 

 

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On 
Behalf Of Ron Baiman
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2024 3:26 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; geoengineering <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [geo] SAI scenario simulator

 

Agreed Andrew. 





This appears to be an efffort to develop a popular SAI simulator for 
“risk-risk” scenarios. I haven’t looked at it but it appears an excellent 
contribution to the effort to legitimize and urgently deploy other “Direct 
Climate Cooling” (DCC) (or “Geoengineering”)

approaches (https://academic.oup.com/oocc/article/4/1/kgae014/7731760 )

And: <https://academic.oup.com/oocc/article/4/1/kgae008/7706251>  
https://academic.oup.com/oocc/article/4/1/kgae008/7706251

 

Ideally down the road such a simulator would also include other (possibly 
complementary) DCC and Short-Term Climate-Driver (STCD) (like methane and black 
carbon emissions reductions) approaches.

 

But good start (and also happy to collaborate) Reflective!

 

Best,

Ron Baiman 













Sent from my iPhone





On Nov 22, 2024, at 1:00 PM, Andrew Song <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:



Great stuff. In the name of one of Reflective's principles (Global engagement), 
I strongly suggest that you also create a mobile optimized site for the 
simulator, since more people have a computer in their pocket, and can't afford 
a large screen to play with the sliders. Happy to collaborate (another 
Reflective principle).

  

<Screenshot 2024-11-22 at 9.52.58 AM.png>

 

 

 

On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 12:58 PM Charlotte DeWald <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Dear geoengineering community,

 

Excited to introduce Reflective <https://reflective.org> , a 
philanthropy-funded initiative focused on SAI research and tech. We are now 
launching an SAI simulator 
<https://reflective-fe.vercel.app/?ssp_scenario=SSP2-4.5&temp_target=1.5&spatial_agg=WGI+Reference&decade_visualization=2091-2100&start_year=2035&ramp_up=10&var=tas>
  to enable policymakers, the media and public to explore regional effects of 
various SAI deployment scenarios as compared to the impacts of continued 
warming. We welcome your feedback as we plan for future iterations.

 

Best,

 

The Reflective Team <https://reflective.org/about/> 

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> .
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/5ef530d3-faba-47fd-b351-d77b5a6c2c23n%40googlegroups.com
 
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/5ef530d3-faba-47fd-b351-d77b5a6c2c23n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
 .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> .
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CANjZVEPMQnx0ayS9z8B7Qg91kbouRazcUwWiQFysceu6N7gNZA%40mail.gmail.com
 
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CANjZVEPMQnx0ayS9z8B7Qg91kbouRazcUwWiQFysceu6N7gNZA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
 .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> .
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/D29171C0-A550-4E9F-8D64-2EAAD1D40CB1%40gmail.com
 
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/D29171C0-A550-4E9F-8D64-2EAAD1D40CB1%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
 .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/066b01db8ac9%240dd05be0%24297113a0%24%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to