YAPS. Oliver, this item came out on Gizmodo disparaging that nut job from Hyannis: https://gizmodo.com/rfk-jr-goes-full-tinfoil-pledges-to-stop-chemtrails-in-latest-dr-phil-interview-2000596357
On Monday, June 16, 2025 at 7:38:06 PM UTC-4 Robert “SputnikWranglerVtoroi” Kennedy wrote: > PS. The text string "chemtrails" does not appear once in it. > > PPS. Written from a US state that banned chemtrails, i.e., they passed a > law against something which does not exist. Passed both lower and upper > house, was signed by the governor last year. That's what we're up against. > > On Monday, June 16, 2025 at 7:35:55 PM UTC-4 Robert > “SputnikWranglerVtoroi” Kennedy wrote: > >> Hi, Oliver. No, I've seen more recent treatments, but not in the >> scientific press. >> >> FYI, the National Academy released its report on *con*trails. (Yes, I >> know, not the same thing at all.) Friend of mine worked on it. See: >> https://www.nationalacademies.org/news/2025/05/coordinated-approach-to-contrails-research-needed-to-ensure-competitiveness-of-u-s-aviation-industry-says-new-report >> >> Robert >> >> On Saturday, June 7, 2025 at 7:26:18 AM UTC-4 Oliver Morton wrote: >> >>> A quick search suggests that the 2016 survey data from the Cooperative >>> Congressional Election Study (CCES) described in "Solar geoengineering >>> and the chemtrails conspiracy on social media" Tingley & Wagner 2017 >>> <https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-017-0014-3#Abs1> is the most >>> recent publicly available source on the prevalence of chemtrail belief. Can >>> this really be true? >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/1118a985-17b1-44e8-8fbd-89101382de16n%40googlegroups.com.
