https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025EF006736

*Authors: *Mengying Zhao, Long Cao, Daniele Visioni, Douglas G. MacMartin

First published: *02 December 2025*

https://doi.org/10.1029/2025EF006736

*Abstract*
Stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) has been proposed as a complementary
option to mitigate anthropogenic climate change risks. Using Community
Earth System Model ensemble simulations, we assess the response of climate
metrics relevant to a set of climate tipping elements in SAI scenarios
targeting different temperature stabilization goals and for implementation
at different latitudes. We analyze responses of tipping element metrics in
simulations of a multi-objective SAI strategy that is designed to
simultaneously stabilize global mean temperature (T0), interhemispheric
temperature gradient (T1), and equator-to-pole temperature gradient (T2),
as well as simulations of SAI strategies designed just to stabilize T0. We
show that SAI strategies considered here would reduce the risks for many
tipping elements, but may either increase or decrease the risk of Antarctic
ice sheet collapse and Sahel greening, depending on the specifics of
injection strategy. For the same 1.0°C temperature stabilization target,
high-latitude injection would reduce the risk of northern
cryosphere-related tipping elements more effectively, such as Greenland ice
sheet, Barents winter sea ice, and boreal permafrost. Meanwhile,
low-latitude injection would be more effective in stabilizing low-latitude
biosphere-related tipping elements such as Amazon rainforest and coral
reefs. The multi-objective SAI injection is more effective in reducing the
risk of most high-latitude tipping elements than low-latitude injection,
and is more effective in reducing the risk of most low-latitude tipping
elements than high-latitude injection. Our study highlights the importance
of careful consideration in the trade-offs between tipping element risk
reduction and temperature pattern optimization in response to SAI
strategies.

*Plain Language Summary*
Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI) is a proposed method to cool the
planet by releasing scattering particles into the upper atmosphere to
reflect sunlight back to space. This climate intervention method would
affect Earth's tipping elements, such as ice sheets and rainforests, which
may exhibit abrupt or irreversible changes upon reaching critical
thresholds. In this study, we use an Earth system model to analyze SAI's
impact on climate metrics that are indicative of the risks of certain
tipping elements crossing their thresholds. Our results show that compared
to the scenario of increasing greenhouse gas emissions without artificial
climate intervention, SAI could reduce the risk for many tipping elements.
Deploying SAI at high latitudes is more effective at protecting northern
cryosphere-related tipping elements such as Greenland ice sheet, Barents
winter sea ice, and boreal permafrost. On the other hand, deploying SAI at
low latitudes is more effective at protecting tipping elements such as
Amazon rainforest and coral reefs. SAI targeting multiple temperature
objectives including global mean temperature, equator-to-pole and
interhemispheric temperature gradient, may not be the optimal approach for
reducing some tipping element risks. Designing SAI strategies therefore
requires carefully weighing the goal of stabilizing temperature pattern
against minimizing tipping element risks.

*Key Points*

We analyze CESM2-simulated response of tipping element metrics to different
strategies of Stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI)

SAI could reduce risks for many but not all tipping elements

Multi-objective injection is not the most effective strategy for many
tipping elements

*Source: AGU*

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAHJsh99hu-mPy4Z3jVYJ7D3F2wzDAU2692yfXgXFEu8UG02hAA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to