https://www.nature.com/articles/s44168-025-00333-3
*Authors: *Shaun D. Fitzgerald, Albert Van Wijngaarden, Ramit Debnath & Zoe Fritz *19 January 2026* *Abstract* Conversations about climate engineering are difficult to have in many spaces. While public debate deserves exploration, we focus on the difficulties scientific discussions around climate engineering face. For inspiration on how to improve this contested space we turn specifically to the history of controversial medical research. Some ways to move forward might consist of establishing an oversight mechanism, defining boundaries and introducing a specialised review system. *Source: Nature Portfolio * -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAHJsh99o-YVkgArD6KbfLmYyFZjmDfAWwmVmSN5cnGvL-o%2BcmA%40mail.gmail.com.
