https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ae3c38

*Authors*: Fangqun Yu, Gan Luo and Arshad Arjunan Nair

*22 January 2026*

*Abstract*
Stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) has been proposed as a strategy to
mitigate the risks and damages of global warming. However, its radiative
efficacydefined here as globally averaged radiative forcing per unit of
sulfur injection rateremains highly uncertain in model simulations due to
complex particle size evolution and large variability in aerosol
representation. In this study, we employ a state-of-the-art, size-resolved
(sectional) Advanced Particle Microphysics (APM) module within two global
models (CESM2 and GEOS-Chem) to investigate the evolution and efficacy of
stratospheric sulfate aerosols from both SO2 and accumulation mode sulfuric
acid (AM-H2SO4) injection. Our comparison of SAI radiative efficacy based
on various global models including the two APM-based (total 14 models for
SO2 and 9 models for AM-H2SO4) shows a large spread, with lower and higher
end values differing by a factor of ~2.5−3. Our APM-based results for SO2
SAI efficacy, including its diminishing returns with increasing sulfur
injection rate (SIR), fall at the upper end of the inter-model spread. For
AM-H2SO4 SAI, the APM-based models show significantly higher efficacy−by
~50% to 200−at lower SIR (≤ 5 Tg(S)·yr−1), followed by a steeper decrease
in efficacy as SIR increases. Notably, the APM-based global model
simulations show that AM-H2SO4 injections consistently exhibit higher
efficacy than SO2 injections, yielding ~55–75% greater radiative forcing
per Tg(S)·yr−1 due to more favorable particle size distributions. Global
sulfate burden increase, effective particle sizes, and particle size
distributions based on different models are compared and possible reasons
leading to different SAI efficacy are discussed. The new SAI efficacy
findings, if confirmed in further studies and model inter-comparisons,
could have important implications for climate intervention strategies,
cost-benefit analyses, and risk assessments.

*Source: IOP Science*

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAHJsh9_z%3DKSOimqKNRU2rC3ek99ED9fyjP44UCgvdfezd3LieA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to