David:

You could do a self-consistency check by doing the procedure in reverse...

Start with the second map, create new polygons which closely follow the ones
you copied from the first map, create a polygon file like before (this
should have the projection info from the second map) and import them into
the first map. Only if both the forward and reverse projection
transformations are correct will the pairs of polygons in both maps maintain
the same spatial relationships with each other...

This is not absolute proof that the transformations are accurate, just
self-consistent.

_______________
Geosoft Inc.
Stephen Cheesman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(905) 315-8207

Software and services for effective earth science decision-making.
Free Oasis montaj interface now available at http://www.geosoft.com
 

-----Original Message-----
From: David Humphrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: June 25, 2002 10:17 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [geonet]: Mixing data from different projections on a map


The more I work with geodesy, I realize how much more I don't know about it.
A project I am currently working on is a case in point.

We have a Geosoft map from another source that was constructed with the
following parameters:

datum:  NAD27
ellipsoid: Clarke 1866
Projection:  UTM Zone 16N
local datum:  [NAD27] MEAN CONUS

This map contains some polygons that I want to put on a second map.  This
second map was constructed with the following parameters:

datum: WGS 84
ellipsoid:  WGS 84
Projection UTM Zone 16N
local datum: [WGS 84] World

What is the best process that I can use so that I am sure that these
polygons are posted in the right place on this second map?  One thing that I
have done is:

1.  In the first map, use Mapping->Get Polygons from a Group.  I find that
this creates a polygon file with some header records containing projection
information.
2.  In the second map, use Mapping->Draw from Polygon File.  Indeed, the
polygons appear on the map.

Are they in the right position?  I have reason to believe that Oasis montaj
uses the header information to do coordinate transformations on-the-fly to
insure that the points are properly placed, but want to check with some
authorities in the Geosoft community to be sure.  Are there simple
experiments one can run that will demonstrate this?

Regards,
David Humphrey
Director, Technical Services
Bell Geospace, Inc

_______________________________________________________
More mailing list info http://www.geosoft.com/support/listserv/index.html
_______________________________________________________
More mailing list info http://www.geosoft.com/support/listserv/index.html

Reply via email to