Hello, I want to clarify some doubts about potential field data modeling in GM-SYS. I can use the TMI or the RTP anomaly when I am modeling magnetic data. But when I am modeling simultaneously magnetic and gravity data is better to use the gravity and reduced to the pole magnetic anomaly? Because the dipolar effect is removed and magnetic anomalies are transformed to monopolar like the gravity anomaly. Ideally what anomaly should I use in this case? Or does the GMSYS apply some correction to the TMI data, because when I create a gmsys model I have to define the magnetic field parameters (magnitude, inclination and declination) at the measurement location? Other question is related to the presence of remanance magnetization. When remanent magnetization is present is better to use the TMI data and not the RTP anomaly? Or I can use other derivative grid like the analytical signal? Best regards, Ana
--- Forum archives can be accessed here: http://lyris.geosoft.com/read/?forum=geonet You are currently subscribed to geonet as: [email protected]. To subscribe or unsubscribe from any of our forums, select the User Forum selection on the Geosoft Community page: http://www.geosoft.com/support/community/forums/register/
