Ok. I've heard murmurs about difficulty in packaging Extjs with our release but it looks like the open source license of Extjs is pure GPL so there should be no problem there right?
http://www.extjs.com/products/license-faq.php On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 5:21 PM, David Winslow <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/14/2010 05:13 PM, Sebastian Benthall wrote: > >> As we approach a 1.0 release, we are going to have to pick a license for >> GeoNode. >> >> This has come up before, but wanted to raise the question again now that >> we have a public thread. >> >> Any reason not to go with GPL? >> >> (The ideologue in me is tempted by AGPL but I don't predict that flying >> well...) >> >> -- >> Sebastian Benthall >> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org >> >> I believe shipping a modified GeoServer obligates us to use GPL (although > it is only a REST extension, so LGPL might be okay. I forget how that > goes.) Once we start hacking on the security system I think we are in > pure-GPL territory. > > AGPL may be an issue if we are encouraging GeoNode-using organizations to > build custom apps on top of GeoNode, probably best not to *require* them to > open up those sources. > > -- > David Winslow > OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org/ > > > -- Sebastian Benthall OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
