Yep.  We've got all that in mind.  Sophia is leading the uploader
development; we'll let you know when things are up on a wiki for your
review.

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:19 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Makes sense with the sending to the geoserver, although as was discussed we
> are going to have to do some things outside of GeoServer's normal usage
> (i.e. metadata). Also, while it makes sense for it technically to be sending
> to the geoserver instance the user will view it as the geonode instance
> ontop of it that they are interacting with. Therefore, we will need to
> figure out how the selecting/configuring the instance the uploader is
> talking to from the UI perspective.
>
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Sebastian Benthall ---06/16/2010 11:11:53
> AM---Moving to the geonode mailing list, as this is getting]Sebastian
> Benthall ---06/16/2010 11:11:53 AM---Moving to the geonode mailing list, as
> this is getting technical. That all makes sense.
>
>
> From:
> Sebastian Benthall <[email protected]>
> To:
> [email protected]
> Date:
> 06/16/2010 11:11 AM
> Subject:
> [geonode] Re: Batch Uploader and Metadata
> Sent by:
> [email protected]
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Moving to the geonode mailing list, as this is getting technical.
>
> That all makes sense.
>
>    The metadata sounds good. It would be preferable if we could have it go
>    to the user account, but if that is significantly more difficult then 
> having
>    the admin account is fine.
>
>
> To be clear, the admin account here would be _a_ user account, it would
> just be an account set to have administrative privileges in the GeoNode
> configuration.
>
>    There is going to have to be able to be some configurability within the
>    Batch uploader no matter what as there will have to be able to be the
>    ability to select which GeoNode instance the user is selecting, if during
>    that process it is determined that also passing a specific users 
> credentials
>    is not significantly more work that would be best.
>
>
> The issue is that the batch uploader will be configured to point at a
> particular GeoServer instance, not a particular GeoNode instance, for the
> purpose of decoupling the technology.
>
> We were talking about passing the credential through to the web app to
> assign ownership, but it's a little cloudy to plan that out since we haven't
> yet implemented the security sharing system and so we don't know the unknown
> unknowns there.
>
> I agree that this is a desirable feature in the long run.
>
>    Alternatively, if we use the first pass solution of assigning to the
>    admin we need to be able for the admin to select multiple files when
>    re-assigning metadata ownership so that the admin does not need to go
>    through the process for each file.
>
>
> That's a good point about the UI on this.
>
> I bet there's a way to get the Django admin API to do these batch
> operations.  Will look into it.
>
>
>
>    *  From: *Sebastian Benthall [*[email protected]* <[email protected]>]
>
>    *
>      Sent: *06/15/2010 05:21 PM AST*
>      To: *Galen Burr Evans
>    *  Subject: *Batch Uploader and Metadata
>
>
>    Hi Galen,
>
>    We've been hammering out the spec for the batch uploader, and I wanted
>    to run a couple details by you to make sure we're on the same page about 
> it.
>
>    First, we want to allow users to be able to batch upload metadata.  For
>    the format for this, we were thinking the metadata would be in XML format 
> in
>    a way that conforms to ISO19139, which is the same standard of which the
>    World Bank standards you sent to me earlier are a subset.
>
>    Second, there was the question of which GeoNode users winds up owning
>    data that is batch uploaded.  We think the most solid way to do it on a
>    first pass is to have anything batch uploaded to a GeoNode owned by the 
> site
>    administrative user by default.  That user can then reassign ownership as
>    needed (once those features are in place.)  We can expand this 
> functionality
>    in the future if users demand it.
>
>    Does this work for you as the deliverables for the first round on th
>    batch uploader?
>
>    --
>    Sebastian Benthall
>    OpenGeo - *http://opengeo.org* <http://opengeo.org/>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sebastian Benthall
> OpenGeo - *http://opengeo.org* <http://opengeo.org/>
>
>
>


-- 
Sebastian Benthall
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org

<<graycol.gif>>

<<ecblank.gif>>

Reply via email to