On 07/07/2010 01:22 PM, Sebastian Benthall wrote: > * Any thoughts on implementation of these before we get to it? Any > objections to it on technical grounds? not really, on either count. this sounds pretty cosmetic so I don't a lot of "technical grounds" involved. maybe I am being short-sighted though. > * I think I'm comfortable enough with the code base here to implement > many of these changes, but I was wondering if anybody would be > interested in collaborating. Basically, I work on it in a branch in > my own fork, or I could make it a branch in the geonode origin repo. > Which is preferable? I'd like to avoid deleting branches from GeoNode/geonode (because deleting stuff is complicated in a distributed system, as well as my own sense of aesthetics (which dictates that branches in the main repository correspond to major release lines of the project)). So, I'd prefer to see temporary branches for work like this in a forked repository.
-- David Winslow OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org/
