This is sweet.

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:46 PM, David Winslow <[email protected]>wrote:

> I didn't anticipate much opposition to using sphinx, so I have actually
> been working on some docs in odd hours since the git migration (which
> broke our older sphinx setup, which depended on svn somehow.)  Anyway,
> check out what I've got here:
>
> http://github.com/dwins/geonode/compare/master...sphinx-docs
>
> "paver html" puts the manual in docs/_build/html/, or you can use make
> if you are like me and have a handy 'jump to errors from make' feature
> in your editor.
>
> --
> David Winslow
> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org/
>
> On 07/14/2010 11:18 AM, David Winslow wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > GeoServer uses Sphinx (http://sphinx.pocoo.org/) to maintain user and
> > developer manuals.
> > GeoExt uses Sphinx to maintain a user/client developer manual (and has a
> > JavaScript API extraction tool we could use too).
> > Django uses Sphinx to maintain a developer manual.
> >
> > It works really well for all of these projects, I say we hop on this
> > bandwagon too.  Any objections?
> >
> > Regardless of the technology choice I am thinking that we should create
> > a single manual aimed at *developers* and *site maintainers.*  Topics
> > covered would include getting a build started, the map configuration
> > system, Django views, customizing map viewers, deployment concerns, etc.
> >
> > Documentation for implementers (feature specs, proposals, etc.) would
> > continue to be maintained in a wiki.
> >
> > --
> > David Winslow
> > OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org/
> >
>
>


-- 
Sebastian Benthall
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org

Reply via email to