On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:36 PM, David Winslow <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 07/22/2010 01:25 PM, Sebastian Benthall wrote: > >> One thing I think would be helpful is a thorough ticket triage in >> preparation for the upcoming 1.0beta release (which is still targeted for >> August 2nd!) >> >> For this, I intend to use the following milestones: >> >> * 1.0beta - for FEATURES remaining to be implemented for 1.0 that are not >> already listed in a prior milestone >> * 1.0 - for bug reports relating to 1.0-supporting features >> * 1.x - for features/bug reports desired for future milestones. >> >> If there are no objections, I'll get to this this afternoon. >> >> -- >> Sebastian Benthall >> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org >> >> What is the triage process going to be like? Should we plan on an IRC > meeting to discuss tickets? > > -d > I was just planning on going for it as a first pass based on the stated criteria, since I didn't think the application of those rules would be controversial enough to warrant wasting time with a meeting. Do you think a meeting would be important in this case? As an intermediate option, I can keep a look out for potentially controversial applications of the criteria and bring them up on this list after. -- Sebastian Benthall OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
