Hi, Could anyone explain/confirm me assumptions behind the GeometryFactory class? Depending on its semantic I'd have some proposal to refactor it. Here are my qusetions:
Are following assumptions correct? 1. Ever instance of Geometry type (or its subtype) can have assigned its own instance of GeometryFactory 2. One instance of GeometryFactory class can be shared (assigned to) between more than one objects of Geometry class 3. It is not assumed that all geometries share the same common instance of GeometryFactory Thanks in advance for comments Cheers -- Mateusz Łoskot http://mateusz.loskot.net _______________________________________________ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@geos.refractions.net http://geos.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel