Martin Davis wrote: > This is uneccessary - there is already a perfectly well defined way > of representing emptiness for every Geometry class. And this is > simple to test.
Sure. Cheers -- Mateusz Łoskot http://mateusz.loskot.net _______________________________________________ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@geos.refractions.net http://geos.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
