Could you try to compute the steps again but with a GEOS version *not* inlined ?
I'm working right now on yet another case where inlined/outlined GEOS versions give different results (the outlined one is correct for my case). We really need a way to stop this FP madness... --strk; On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 09:33:59AM -0500, Howard Butler wrote: > The geometry is my own, and it is not from the JTS test suite. Using > Python Cartographic Library with a GEOS 2.2.2 produces a result that > is more in line with the expected one (a single polygon rather than a > concatenated multipolygon). > > > > At 04:52 PM 6/12/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>From which file from JTS did you extract the test ? > >I haven't seen the geometries visually, did you ? > >The default precision model is FLOATING (double), right, > >but for XML tests the precision model can be specified > >with the <precisionModel> tag. > > > >--strk; _______________________________________________ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@geos.refractions.net http://geos.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
