[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 11:17:20PM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 10:30:21PM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>>>> With GEOS-3.0.0 initGEOS/finishGEOS do not instantiate/delete a >>>>> GeometryFactory anymore. Rather the default GeometryFactory is >>>>> used. This should fix the problem. >>>> What about backport to 2.2.x with ref-counted proposal? Such >>>> changes could would not affect existing code. >>> Ok with me. >>> >>>> I'd like to repeat that in general, global factory should be >>>> replaced with shared object (e.g. managed by shared_ptr from Boost >>>> or our own home-made shared smart pointer). static factory can >>>> cause problems too: >>>> http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/ctors.html#faq-10.12 >>> We're using "construct on first use" idiom if I'm not wrong (see faq >>> 10.13). >> Yes, we are. >> But we still need to be careful: >> http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/ctors.html#faq-10.14 > > I was waiting for this answer :) > I don't think anyone's destructor is relying on GeometryFactory use.
Heh, you know, just in case... Evil is Watching ;-) Cheers -- Mateusz Loskot http://mateusz.loskot.net _______________________________________________ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@geos.refractions.net http://geos.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
