Hi, Markus Schaber wrote:
> I've attached a patch that should fix all differences between header and > implementation in the C-API. > > It compiles fine, but is not tested further. Actually, my code compiled fine, but the patch was broken. Strk, thanks for your note on IRC. I had accidentally fixed the GEOSGeom typo in geos_c.h instead of geos_c.h.in. And as geos_c.h is not removed in "make clean", only in "make distclean", I did not notice. Apply the following patch to the .diff file I sent (or correct geos_c.h.in manually). --- ../capi_unify.diff 2006-10-26 15:47:55.638568500 +0200 +++ ../capi_unify2.diff 2006-10-27 11:19:25.214624250 +0200 @@ -780,7 +780,7 @@ typedef void (*GEOSMessageHandler)(const char *fmt, ...); + -+#ifndef GEOSGEOM ++#ifndef GEOSGeom typedef struct GEOSGeom_t *GEOSGeom; typedef struct GEOSCoordSeq_t *GEOSCoordSeq; +#endif The resulting code compiles fine, and seems to pass "make check" on i386 and AMD64. But I get loads of messages like: > Trying with original input. > Did not run OverlayResultValidator as the precision model is not > floating Btw, it seems that "make check" does not include any C-API tests... HTH, Markus -- Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS Fight against software patents in Europe! www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@geos.refractions.net http://geos.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
