Hi, Strk, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Have you tried runnign an already compiled postgis (compiled > against 2.2.3) with this new version of the CAPI ? > Have you tried *building* postgis against this new version > of the CAPI ?
I'll do so as soon as I find enough time. > (the first 3 warnings seems actually good to me, the last one > haven't looked at more closely, but seems related to the wrong > 'constness' we gave (to pointer instead of to object pointed to)) Looking closer, I also think that those warnings are not so scary any more, and that it might be possible to write clients that compile to both 2.2.X and 3.0.0 without any warnings. HTH, Markus -- Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS Fight against software patents in Europe! www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@geos.refractions.net http://geos.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
