On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 09:46:00AM -0700, Daniel Azuma wrote: > Just a little opinion on this, as I'm actually starting to use ffi-geos. If > it is to be the de facto ruby binding for GEOS, it should expose the same > flexibility that GEOS provides, including control over when and whether to > produce a prepared geometry, so that clients that need that level of control > can have it. A transparent implementation is very useful and could also be > done, but it should be an optional API that can be turned on or off.
So how do you like an explicit .prepare() on Geometry objects ? And maybe an .unprepare() to release memory associated with the preparation. --strk; () Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer /\ http://strk.keybit.net/services.html _______________________________________________ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel