On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 09:46:00AM -0700, Daniel Azuma wrote:
> Just a little opinion on this, as I'm actually starting to use ffi-geos. If 
> it is to be the de facto ruby binding for GEOS, it should expose the same 
> flexibility that GEOS provides, including control over when and whether to 
> produce a prepared geometry, so that clients that need that level of control 
> can have it. A transparent implementation is very useful and could also be 
> done, but it should be an optional API that can be turned on or off.

So how do you like an explicit .prepare() on Geometry objects ?
And maybe an .unprepare() to release memory associated with the preparation.

--strk;

  ()   Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer
  /\   http://strk.keybit.net/services.html
_______________________________________________
geos-devel mailing list
geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel

Reply via email to