On 2 October 2017 at 10:08, Regina Obe <l...@pcorp.us> wrote: > On 2 October 2017 at 09:30, Bas Couwenberg <sebas...@xs4all.nl> wrote: >> On 2017-10-02 09:13, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >>>> >>>> As Bas said already it causes packagers headaches. >>> >>> So, the solution is to take the toys away from the kids... >>> >>> >>> Please help us understand your point of view. Why do you want to keep >>> the >>> C++ API? > >> Please, don't try to help me solve my problems. >> Those are orthogonal to the matter discussed here. > > They are not orthogonal when your use is hurting me. > At that point you've made your problem my problem and I need to solve yours > to solve mine.
I only ask to keep deploying all GEOS headers and libraries, that's it. You think that is dangerous because some projects may prefer to stick to C++ API, so you want to prevent them from such freedom of choice. Please, consider me out of this discussion. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net _______________________________________________ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel