My vote is the same as Vicky's - spaces, with indenting using multiples of 2.
Reasons: - lots of religious discussion on the interweb about tabs vs spaces, but a quick read seems to indicate that the spaces camp is more popular - spaces are more deterministic than tabs - 2 rather than 4 gives more space for code Martin On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 9:45 AM Regina Obe <l...@pcorp.us> wrote: > As many know the GEOS code base is a mess of different formatting. > Particular with tabs and spaces. > Our .editorconfig is equally messy in the name of compromise. > > I'd like to make a Motion starting with GEOS 3.8 to reformat the .cpp, .h, > and .c > > I think the other extensions are pretty standard and should stay as they > are. > > That said, what would people prefer? > > I vote: > > TABS > > > Please all PSC and all developers who commit to GEOS voice an opinion. > We'll count the votes and go with the consensus with each vote counting > equally. > If any non-dev, non-PSC have an opinion, feel free to voice an opinion > keeping note we may not care about your opinion, but might possibly sway > ours :) > > Once done - pramsey or cvvergara or strk will do a 1000 pound commit to > update all these files (including the editorconfig) > > Thanks, > Regina > > _______________________________________________ > geos-devel mailing list > geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
_______________________________________________ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
