Ah, yes, I had svn-3.5 checked out when I was running those searches. Whooops.
Not much objection to getting rid of the typedefs [2] that I can see. Unless we really thing c++ is going to change the smart pointer implementations yet again. (an open question, I suppose) P [2] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/2018-December/008750.html > On Jan 29, 2019, at 11:53 AM, Daniel Baston <dbas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think auto_ptr has been removed from master already, no? I'd prefer to lose > the typedefs as well, but last time we brought that up I recall there being > some disagreement. > > Dan > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 2:19 PM Paul Ramsey <pram...@cleverelephant.ca > <mailto:pram...@cleverelephant.ca>> wrote: > Any reason not to renovate the code base and remote the various uses > of auto_ptr in favour of unique_ptr and strip out the various typedefs > at the same time so that we uniformly just use std::unique_ptr<> right > in code where folks can see it? > > P. > _______________________________________________ > geos-devel mailing list > geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel > <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel>_______________________________________________ > geos-devel mailing list > geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
_______________________________________________ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
