Thanks, I'm going to procede to merge to master when I'm green on CI. I have added all the JTS tests, so I feel good about the foundation. Once I have merge to master, I'm going to experiment with adding one of the new bigendian architectures supported by Travis into the CI (because more CI!)
P. > On Apr 16, 2020, at 4:46 AM, Sandro Santilli <s...@kbt.io> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 02:16:52PM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote: > >> The only reason we're using ttmath is because Mateusz happened to >> choose it for his initial experiments on supporting the higher precision >> code in JTS. Turns out there's no reason we cannot use exactly the same >> routines as JTS does, though, and they have NO ENDIAN assumptions in them, >> so they'll be portable. > > +1 for that, JTS routines seems best option to me. > > --strk; > _______________________________________________ > geos-devel mailing list > geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel _______________________________________________ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
