Would it be this one? https://github.com/libgeos/geos/commit/bacd58058025b25de93fb23bb78ff540ef1e3b63
Paul was having some issues with output precision, but I can't remember the details. He made some kind of fix - perhaps this one. Agreed that the output in sci not for such small numbers is not useful. On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 1:12 PM Sandro Santilli <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm looking at this report from XMLTester and wondering what > happened to output digits: > > Description: AA - sliver triangle, cut by polygon > Geometry A: POLYGON ((1e+01 1e+01, 1e+02 1e+01, 1e+01 1e+01, 1e+01 > 1e+01)) > Geometry B: POLYGON ((9e+01 0, 2e+02 0, 2e+02 2e+02, 9e+01 2e+02, > 9e+01 0)) > Expected result: LINESTRING (9e+01 1e+01, 1e+02 1e+01) > Obtained result: POINT (9e+01 1e+01) > > You can see the above output is not very useful. I've the impression > we used to have more digits printed, do you remember which commit took > them off ? > > --strk; > > () Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer > /\ https://strk.kbt.io/services.html > _______________________________________________ > geos-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
_______________________________________________ geos-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
