I'm fine with having only cmake if the issue Paul raised below is fixed. That is what I currently use for building.
> -----Original Message----- > From: geos-devel [mailto:geos-devel-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of > Paul Ramsey > Sent: Friday, January 8, 2021 12:30 PM > To: GEOS Development List <geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org> > Subject: Re: [geos-devel] RFC7: Discontinue use of autotools > > > > > On Jan 8, 2021, at 9:25 AM, Daniel Baston <dbas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I think the question we need to resolve is whether, after 11 years of > working with and 5 years of officially supporting two build systems, we need > to continue to spend developer effort maintaining both systems in order to > accommodate those preferences. > > I agree. I can think of only one further technical task, which is ensuring that > the outputs of the cmake 'make dist' target are run through to 'make check' > in CI. Being able to bundle a release via 'make dist' is a very handy thing and > makes 'tag to release automatically' a potential CI target which would also be > nice. > > P. > _______________________________________________ > geos-devel mailing list > geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel _______________________________________________ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
