On 1/8/21 11:10 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote: > I think binary packagers would have the most informed opinion on the > matter as they are the ones that build on multiple-platforms, usually. > We poor developers mostly build for our single development machines, > so I'd listen carefully to what people like Greg Troxel say. Switching from autotools to cmake is generally a regression from a packager point of view. Autotools is much better supported on Linux and many architectures. And its features heavily used for hardening buildflags, multiarch, etc. CMake requires more work to make such features work, upstreams seldomly care about those where packagers do.
Ideally both remain supported, autotools for Linux and friends, and CMake for Windows where autotools is too much of a pain to use. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 _______________________________________________ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
