I have the beginnings of a separate site on a branch. I was honestly planning on hosting on GH pages. There is a solid purpose to a separate site, as a clean place for examples and documentation beyond just header doco and doxygen.
> On Aug 22, 2021, at 11:16 PM, Regina Obe <l...@pcorp.us> wrote: > > Right now GEOS does not have a real site. > > geos.osgeo.org is sitting on OSGeo6, which the index page simply redirects > to trac.osgeo.org/geos. > The snapshot and doxygen build was done under pramsey's account on osgeo6 > and that's the only thing that is hosted on geos.osgeo.org (which is on > osgeo6). > > This is all fine except for the fact I want to get rid of osgeo6 (or at > least move all project related stuff off of it so it's just dedicated to > mailman). > It also has a cmake that is older than what we support (Cmake 3.7 vs. our > minimal 3.8 for main branch). Though I guess that will be fixed when I > upgrade osgeo6 to buster in a couple of months. > > I have this ticket in place - https://trac.osgeo.org/geos/ticket/1123 Which > I'd like some feedback on. > > The big thing that is sorely missed is our doxygen build which someone > already complained about a couple months ago. > The daily snapshots I'm guessing most people can use that generated by our > git or git mirrors. > > What are people's thoughts. > > 1) Is there a benefit to having a dedicated website for geos? > 2) Alternatively could just have Jenkins build the doxygen as part of > regression run and be the redirector to trac. > > Thanks, > Regina > > > > _______________________________________________ > geos-devel mailing list > geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel _______________________________________________ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
