> On Jun 7, 2023, at 5:26 PM, Greg Troxel <g...@lexort.com> wrote: > > If I install the 3.12.0beta1 package, then the tests pass. So there is > a bug, but it is that the tests appaprently refer to installed files, > rather than being controlled to use only files in the build tree.
We had this out last release, it’s specific to a particular OS. Happy to look over a cmake patch. https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/2022-June/010723.html > This > requires alternate rpath processing, etc., and in the autoconf world is > usually handled by libtool relinking at install time. > > Therefore, I have no reason to think 3.12.0beta1 is more troubled than > any previous release -- this is likely not a regression. > > My only question then about 3.12.0beta1 is if the comings-and-goings > diff of .h files is what the authors intend. Probably! I’ll look at that diff. P > > I am kicking off a process to rebuild everything that depends on geos > (that I have installed, but that extends all the way to postis and > qgis). > _______________________________________________ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
