Saul Farber ha scritto: > I actually think namespaces are a very cool idea in geoserver. They > allow a common back-end data "structuring" that allows different blocks > of data to have the same type name without conflicting. > > Also, the wmsPath (as I understand it) doesn't really have much to do > with namespaces. It's about mapping wms layers into the (imho confused) > wms layer "tree". Am I confusing that wmsPath with a a different one > (the one on the UI?) > > Either way, I'm definitely +1 for keeping namespaces around!
I'm definitely +1 me too, since they are a nice way to organise thing, and we're going to use them to tie down security as well. Anyways, Justin's patch is more about not enforcing their usage. I guess that with the appropriate error message, like: "Hey moron, there are mgis:states, sf:states, cite:states, care to tell me which one you want?" allowing a non prefixed match by full scan all existing layers is going to be fine. Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
