Rob Atkinson ha scritto:
>>  Can you make me an example of "getting the info from the optimal place
>>  in the optimal way"? Afaik with the current configuration API we have
>>  just one place to grab each information we need to build up a UI,
>>  and this sounds like a very good thing (TM) imho.
>>
> 
> OK, for example, we specify namespaces in several locations (schema,
> info, datastore config, catalog file, SLD), but they should all be
> inherited from the target schema (yes I know I'm talking about
> community schema support, but there is very little requirement for WFS
> without it - do you see many deployed?)

In production? Tens for sure, probably more.
Community schema is a nice to have, but lack of it did not stop
people from deploying WFS server all around the world.

Why do you have to put community schema as a requirement for everything
that has to be done in GeoServer is frankly beyond my comprehension.

I won't discuss this any further, since this is about feature type 
configuration, not about the UI framework.

Cheers
Andrea

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to