Sorry, hit send accidentally, here it goes again: Hi,
I'm still debugging for this issue: <http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-1816> The thing is, I don't think we should take the request as it is in that issue as valid, since it is using an invalid type name. What I mean is, if you don't want to use the namespace prefix in the TypeName element, you should make the request default namespace the one of the feature type you want. For instance, the following request do work: <wfs:DescribeFeatureType version="1.0.0" service="WFS" xmlns:wfs="http://www.opengis.net/wfs"; xmlns="http://www.openplans.org/topp"; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.opengis.net/wfs http://schemas.opengis.net/wfs/1.0.0/WFS-basic.xsd";> <wfs:TypeName>states</wfs:TypeName> </wfs:DescribeFeatureType> Now, the parser is doing a correct parse for the request, and using a request body like the one in the issue parses the "states" type name in the request default namespace, which is the wfs namespace. So, do we still want to insert a hack to handle that? I would say not, so I'm asking for more votes to take action in one direction or the other. regards, Gabriel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
