Chris Holmes wrote: > Is all the community schema work still taking place on a forked module > on 1.6.x?
Yes. > It seems like a bunch of effort is being put into it there, > which will then all have to be ported? That is correct. And it sucks. We have hard deadlines that require delivery now and cannot wait for a port to trunk. Yes, this is making more work for ourselves. Yes, I will resist all attempts to add new features until the port to trunk is done. In some cases, my resistance is futile. > What readiness on trunk is being waited for? It has the new feature model on > it, and we've done an alpha > release. I think the trunk is satisfactory. Trunk is not the problem. > Is there a plan to get on trunk? Or maybe I missed it and > it's already there? There is a stated goal. I am not sure if it has been published. There is no plan, per se. I will make enquiries and report back. -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Software Engineer, CSIRO Exploration and Mining Australian Resources Research Centre 26 Dick Perry Ave, Kensington WA 6151, Australia ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
