Should we be handling version numbers on branches differently? I too have gotten confused by this on a few occasions? Is there a Best Practice for this sort of thing?
Thanks, Mike Pumphrey Outreach Engineer The Open Planning Project Alexander Petkov wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Andrea Aime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Alexander Petkov ha scritto: >>> Greetings, >>> >>> I downloaded the 1.6.x branch, which after compiling it shows >>> 1.6.1-beta version. >>> >>> Is this branch aligned with the 1.6.3 release and showing an earlier >>> version, or does one need to download 1.6.3 source from somewhere >>> else? >> We just never changed the i18n files that have that "1.6.1-beta" >> string, but rest assured you have the latest in your hands. >> Cheers >> Andrea >> > > Cool, I thought that might be the case :) > > Alex > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Geoserver-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel > > !DSPAM:4051,4832e50a216194901796417! > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
