Andrea Aime wrote: > Ah ha, interesting one. That is always a scary statement comming from you Andrea. It usually means I have uncovered something that is going to hurt my brain to figure out. > LRU already has its own priority (you get to top when used and move > towards the land of the dead when others are > used), wouldn't adding another priority concept mess up things? > What about having multiple queue, and a way to set a "regionId" or > something like that to decide in which queue a resource ends up? > Most datastores may end up in the standard ds queue, but some, > like ArcSDE, and maybe WFS and Oracle (when not using JNDI pools) > should end up in their own? Okay lets me try getting out of this quick: - do *nothing* for the first cut; LRU is simple and we got enough going on (I think everyone is tired right now and we need to rest up before the sprint; draw some icons or something) - do *nothing* for the second cut; and punt the responsibility on your "DataSource" factory finder should take care of recycling JDBC "pools" should it not?
The only thing that leaves out in the cold is ArcSDE; a concern for a small portion of our users so ... - consider a "priority" or a flag to keep something like an ArcSDE entry in the queue when an arcsde user notices and asks us for it Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
