Looks pretty cool Andrea, I like it. The only question I really have is about the conversation we had about workspace and namespace. I think we more or less came to the conclusion that what we think of as a "namespace" at the configuration level now will become a "workspace". And the idea of namespace will be something related to wfs, and more of an attribute on a layer rather then a container. So for transition purposes for now it makes sense to have namespaces and workspaces "mirror" each other.
So I guess my question is do we want to start referring to workspace now rather than workspace? Instead of having to change terminology later? Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > building on top of the new configuration GSIP, here is the "per layer > security GSIP", aka "data level security": > http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+19+-+Per+layer+security > > Questions/comments/feedback welcome. It would be nice to be able to vote > on this in next week IRC meeting. > > Cheers > Andrea > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Geoserver-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel > > !DSPAM:4007,48367a9d36662143011171! > -- Justin Deoliveira The Open Planning Project [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
