Alessio Fabiani ha scritto: > Hi guys, > > I almost agree with you David, and also I think RESTConfig should not be > included into 1.7.x release at least in this very incomplete state, but > anyway it is a valid alternative to interact with GS catalog > configuration ... so what I'm thinking is that maybe we can distribute > it as a GeoServer 1.7.x extension or something like that. Does it make > sense?
I agree with this line of thinking. Release it as an extension with a big "subject to change" warning. The message could be that we understand the need of programmatic catalog manipulation and we're throwing a rope to anybody needing it, but warn people to not rely too much on it, and isolate their client code so that they can update when a full blown, supported and included by default rest subsystem shows up. Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
