+1 on GSIP 20 as well. I also like the idea of not giving a GSIP a number until it is actually active.
Andrea Aime wrote: > Jody Garnett ha scritto: >> I took a run through the GSIP pages listed as under discussion ... I >> have missed a few geoserver meetings and wanted to catch up. >> >> http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+12+-+Mock+Test+Support >> - proposal seems incomplete? >> - I actually thought some of this work was done? >> - While it is important and effects our coding policies as developers it >> will not effect the shipped product to any great extent; does this need >> to be a GSIP? > > This has actually been implemented ages ago, before 1.6.0 got released, > and it's the testing framework we're using today. The GSIP should be > cancelled thought, it does not describe what we do have today. > >> http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+17+-+Community+module+handling >> http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+18+-+Output+Format+Cleanup > > http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+22+-+Extensions > > > http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+21+-+KML+Vector+Transformer+Refactoring > > These were in the making but they seem to be stalled. When a proposal > is in the conception state should probably avoid giving them numbers and > keep them in a separate area until they are ready to be discussed and > voted. Like putting them in R&D or having a "proposal shipyard" area. > >> http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+19+-+Per+layer+security >> - proposal has been voted on and approved? And should be moved to accepted > > It is actually done, besides eventual bugfixing, so I moved it > to the completed proposals area. > >> http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+20+-+Automated+Regionating+in+KML+MapProducer >> - proposal is better than last time I reviewed; no indication that >> voting is started > > David should take care of pushing for a vote. For what it's worth, here > is my +1 :) > >> http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+24+-+TIME-ELEVATION-BAND+parameters+parsing+for+WMS+1.1.1+WCS+1.X >> - seems to be a refresh of the WCS cod >> - not even sure if the time elevation band functionality works after the >> proposal or if this is just setup? It is just listed in the title; not >> in the tasks >> - voting has not started > > Actually voting has started yesterday during the meeting (logs here: > http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/2008/07/15/IRC+logs+July+15). > > Cheers > Andrea > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Geoserver-devel mailing list > Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel > > !DSPAM:4007,487db79e110495332866982! > -- Justin Deoliveira The Open Planning Project [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
