OK - I suppose thats a valid sanity check - not enough info to help formulate the request, since you dont even know what attributes of what feature types it applies to, but you can reject some dumb ones. Anyway, its such a trivial thing to advertise them we can do it now. I was just sceptical about its value, but if there are clients that care its valuable enough for now.
Rob -----Original Message----- From: Jody Garnett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 7/22/2008 11:51 AM To: Rob Atkinson Cc: Atkinson, Rob (CLW, Lucas Heights); Caradoc-Davies, Ben (E&M, Kensington); [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Geotools-devel] Registered function support for JDBC databases Rob Atkinson wrote: > hmm - IMHO not having to get a WFS change request is starting small. > Just accepting that we can get the functionality working and work out > how to advertise it later (i.e. there isnt really much point > advertising it if its feature specific) seems to me a much lower bar. Difficulty is that when we make requests from udig against a wfs we tend to check the request against the published capabilities; so we can catch the use of functions that won't be recognized. Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
