Mike Pumphrey ha scritto:
> Hello. Current CITE test results on version 1.7.x (what will become 
> 1.7.0-beta2) are as follows:
> 
> 
> WFS 1.1 - Session s0064
> 
> Failed:  Issues with GetFeature (GET and POST)
> http://cite.opengeospatial.org/teamengine/viewSessionLog.jsp?session=s0064&t=1217359861299

Hum, this one is nasty. There are two versions of the wfs 1.1 test 
suite, the current one you're using, and the new one that was developed 
along with ows5 that was meant to expand and fix the current one.
1.7.0-beta2 passes the whole test on the new one, but does not on the 
old one.
It all boils down to the usage of urn notation for epsg codes, the old
test expects urn:x-ogc:def:crs:EPSG:6.11.2:4326 and we output
urn:x-ogc:def:crs:EPSG:4326 instead.

I've tried to change the code to please the old test suite, but as soon 
as I do, there is one test in the new one that seems to be hard-coded to
expect urn:x-ogc:def:crs:EPSG:4326, and it fails.

I opened two jira issues about this, one for the fix that allows the 
official test suite to pass, and another to fix the problem in the new,
non official one:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-2064
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-2065

For the moment I haven't fixed either of them, we need to find the
best course of action with a little discussion. Not very problematic
for a beta, we don't need to pass all the tests anyways and the existing 
failures are rather trivial.

> 
> WFS 1.0 - Session s0065
> 
> Failed:  Issues with Basic/GetFeature/ComplexValues
> http://cite.opengeospatial.org/teamengine/viewSessionLog.jsp?session=s0065&t=1217361209913

This one is a mis-configuration of the test. We don't support complex 
features, but the test has been configured to test them too.
I've run the test without enabling complex features and it passed.


> 
> WMS 1.1 - Session s0066
> 
> Passed!  :)
> http://cite.opengeospatial.org/teamengine/viewSessionLog.jsp?session=s0066&t=1217362008402
> 
> 
> WCS 1.0 - Session 0100 (old site)
> 
> Failed 22/97 (hard to categorize the issues here)
> http://cite.opengeospatial.org/tsOGC/interface/ViewResultsSummary?ts=0100&sesstype=OGC

Mumble, it's probably the first time we run this test with 1.7.x.
Some tests are failing because the engine does not specify a version,
and expects us to react with an exception, and we do, but only after
getting detoured into the wcs 1.1.1 code (highest version is the default
one) meaning we throw the wrong kind of exception... sigh:

http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-2066

All the issues we have a relatively minor, so I guess we can go on and 
release beta2, and we'll then fix everything by rc1.
Cheers
Andrea

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to