+1 from me too. (and if we can abstract it to allow future use of version control in the background we could one day exploit it to provide a revert function)
RA On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Jody Garnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Justin Deoliveira wrote: >> +1. The new configuration backend was designed for this paradigm. Trying >> to keep feature parity with the old user interface by providing a Save / >> Revert is proving to be quite a bit of work. >> > +1 Explaining the Load / Apply / Save is always one of the highlights of > any training course I do (I can always tell who tried out GeoServer > prior to the class by the number of "ah-ha" sounds). > > Jody > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Geoserver-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
