First off I want to say that its looking great, some great work was done while I was away. However there are a few things i noticed today while hooking up persistence. I am curious as to other peoples thoughts.
* use of word "Manager" It seems redundant. I mean... we could call everything a "manager" that is used to configure. What was wrong with "Resources", "Namespaces", and "Styles" in the menu? * feedback under page heading Feedback messages appear above the page heading and description. I think it might be a bit nicer if it apperd below the heading, and above the rest of the page content. Or maybe on the right hand side of the page so that none of the main content on the page shifts up and down. * use of icons vs buttons On the resources page, we have icons for add,edit,delete, but on the namespaces and style pages we have buttons with words on them. I am wondering if we could make these consistent, or if there is an explicit reason. I suspect maybe because of the limited real estate in the resource tree? * line between data and publishing seems blurred If you look at the ResourceConfigurationPage, the data tab seems to have content that i would think belongs on the publishing side of the fence. Things like title,keywords,abstract, and published bounding box all belong on the layer that is published, not the native resource. I cant remember if we came up with this at the sprint, i apologize for being out of the loop for so long. -JD -- Justin Deoliveira The Open Planning Project [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
