While I feel that releasing the .WAR only will limit the scope of who is 
able/willing to test the new UI (SourceForge downloads indicate that 
twice as many people download the .EXE than the .WAR), I think many of 
us would agree that it is still preferable to release _something_ rather 
than slog through the revamping of the release process for the new UI 
(which could take a few weeks).  We'll end up doing that in parallel, 
but we'll get something out in the meantime.  The new UI is worth 
looking at.  :)

Mike

David Winslow wrote:
> So, in light of the (a) need to get the UI out there for some community 
> feedback and (b) outstanding policy issues related to making the Wicket 
> modules part of the release, I propose we just release the new UI as 
> .war only, since this can be done without needing to touch the release 
> process. 
> 
> -David Winslow
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> Geoserver-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to