I think the community docs would necessarily be in a wiki format. As for the official canon, I don't think that adding version control/management would be a bad thing.
The other thing to mention is that one-off docs (GSIPs, etc) would necessarily not be part of this framework, just the basic docs that presumably wouldn't be so variable. That said, if you have other suggestions on tools, I'm happy to hear of them. I really like Sphinx, personally, and its PDF output is magnificent. :) Thanks, Mike Andrea Aime wrote: > Mike Pumphrey ha scritto: >> Hi there. I've written up a GSIP (my first!) and would like >> everyone's feedback on it. >> >> http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+25+-+New+Documentation+Framework > > Mumble is it just me, or only DocuWiki can be edited online? > The other two would have to be stored in svn, right? > The parallel structure is ok for me, I'd say, at least the > community contributed docs should be in a wiki. > > Choice wise, I would like to avoid anything that requires > a build to see the resulting page, and in particular docbook, tried > it out manually and also with a java based helper editor > (free for docbook), was a pain in both cases. > > Cheers > Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
