I like the proposal. +1 for the GeoServer side of things. I am still not too sure about the GeoTools side of it though. This sort of policy will be harder to pull off there due to multiple projects working against the same version. I know at the moment on 2.5 GeoServer is the main project driving it, but there are other people developing against it.
Regardless, do we need to start another proposal on the Geotools side? Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi all, > here is the change proposal for RC handling procedures: > http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+26+-+Long+freeze+handling+procedures > > Oh, if you can think of a better title, feel free to change, I could > not come up with anything better. > > If you need to discuss this more please do, otherwise let's start voting. > > Cheers > Andrea > -- Justin Deoliveira OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Enterprise support for open source geospatial. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
