Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: >> Yeah, that would look nice and would be usable by most clients... >> the issue is that the list of encodings should be user customizable, >> there are lots out there. Not sure where we could put that... in a >> parameter within web.xml maybe? > Hmmm... adding another thing to web.xml for something that probably will > not be used seems like make work to me. I mean if clients start asking > it for by all means... but lets keep things simple first, adding > complexity if we need to.
Well, I believe that the simplest thing is to actually advertise just SHAPE-ZIP but recognize SHAPE-ZIP;encoding=.... in the requests. Using format_options or allowing a comma separated list of items in web.xml for the supported encodings have more or less the same cost in my mind. I would go for the first, as this issue actually impacts a limited amount of users. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
