For right now I don't think we need to get in valid KML. Since we're going to defer emphasis on the geosearch stuff the main client for KML still is Google Earth. In the future that will change, and we'll work to improve it. But for now generating KML from things without fids is more important than valid KML, imho.
C Justin Deoliveira wrote: > It is currently unclear how to proceed on the valid KML issue. The issue > can be summed up in this jira issue: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-2447 > > But basically it boils down to that with the patch as written, we can't > generate KML from datastores which do not provide reliable fids. The > most common case of this is a db table with a primary key. > > However i am told from arne that if we do not produce valid KML then > there are issues with GeoSearch. > > Dwins came up with the idea to use a temp file approach. David can you > expand on this? I am not 100% sure what the plan is there. > > -Justin > > -- Chris Holmes OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
